|
News
|
A comparative table
of how cannabis and marijuana is treated by European* legal systems
NORML Annual Conference,
February 3-5, 2000
Author: Joel Auster
*15 members of
the European Union plus Switzerland
Preambule
- From the EMCDDA Report, 1998
- Cannabis is one
of the most controversial policy issues in EU countries. Although
it is a classified narcotic drug placed under control by the United
Nations and by all Member States, the measures adopted to control
it vary considerably. While aIl Member States' drug laws involve severe
measures against trafficking in cannabis, there are significant differences
for 'personal use' consumption or possession, which themselves are
defined and regulated in different ways from one country to another.·Some
countries or regions tolerate some forms of cannabis possession and
consumption.·Some countries apply less severe penalties when cannabis
is involved in the offence.·Even in countries where the formal legislation
is severe concerning penalisation for cannabis offences (for instance
in Member States which do flot differentiate between drugs), there
are increasingly pragmatic approaches to the implementation of drug
legislation.
- As most legislations
adopt either a punitive or clinical perspective for dealing with drug
use offences, the concept of 'recreational use' is not generally recognised
and poses practical difficulties for the implementation of criminal
justice policy.
LEGAL COMPARATIVE
TABLE
Updated January
2000
Classification Legend
DU : Depenalization/tolerance
of use/consumption (small amounts generally), i.e. "use is not
an offense"
DP : Depenalization/tolerance
of possession/detention (small amounts generally)
RU : Distinctions
between "regular users" and "occasional users" in
prosecutions and sentences
SD : Dictinction
between "soft" and "hard" drugs (i.e., cannabis
not classified in the same category as heroin or other hard drugs)
LC : Legalization
schemes for dealing and private consumption
L? : Country which
would be ready to adopt some kind of "controled legalization"
schemes
P? : Country that
seems to move towards more prohibition
(..) : Tendancy
towards...
Country
|
Classes
|
Details
|
Austria
|
DU
- DP
|
- Withdrawal
of reports in case of first consumption of cannabis.
- Penalties
are defined also according to the quantity of drug involved;
petty crimes (small quantity) fine and/or up ta six months'
imprisonment.
|
Belgium
|
DU
- DP
RU
|
- Possession
and cultivation for personal use less likely to be punished.
- To use
in public, incite use, sell or traffic remain serious offences.
|
Denmark
|
DU
|
- No formal
distinction between drugs.
- A first
offence results in entry in Central Criminal Register.
- Subsequent
offences resuit in fines or penalties.
- Recommendation
of cautions for possession of small quantities.
|
Finland
|
(RU)
(SD)
|
- Use sentenced
with a fine, or a maximum of 2 years' imprisonment.
- In the
application of penalties no distinction is made between drugs
(however, Finnish Law contains the concept of 'very dangerous
drug', which may cause death by overdose or senious damage to
health).
|
France
|
RU
P?
|
- No legal
distinction between drugs, the use of which can result in a
fine and/or up to one year imprisonment. Medical treatment and
social care for heavy cannabis users, acceptance of treatment
being an alternative to penalties.
- Warning
for first offence of cannabis use, if use is occasional and
the user socially integrated.
- In practise,
police can keep in custody for 4 days (instead of 2 for other
crimes) someone found with small quantities of cannabis, officialy
to prevent networked-trafficking.
|
Germany
|
DU
DP
RU
|
- Possession
of small quantities for personal use is a criminal offence,
but will not be prosecuted/punished as long as the person is
not a regular user and that there is no harm to third persons.
- Landers'
Attorneys determine what is a "small amount" that
would not lead to punishment:
- - Schleswig-Holstein:
30 g
- - Hessen
and Northrhine-Westfalia: 10 g to 30 g
- - Hamburg:
"the volume of one match-box" or 10 g
- - Berlin,
Bremen, Saarland: 10 g
- - Bavaria,
Baden-Wurttemberg: 6 g.
|
Greece
|
DP
RU
|
- No distinction
made between 'soft'and 'hard' drugs.
- It is considered
that use can result in psychological and/or physical dependence,
acts as a 'gateway drug' and a risk to society.
|
Ireland
|
RU
SD
|
- Distinction
made between possession for personal use and possession with
intent to supply.
- Fines for
possession of cannabis for personal use for flrst or second
offences.
|
Italy
|
DU
- DP
SD
|
- A 1993
referundum has confirmed 1970s laws that officially depenalized
consumption.
- Warning
for first offence of possession for personal use.
- Subsequent
offences having the purposes of personal use result in administrative
sanctions (suspension of driving licence, gun licence or passport).
- A new law
may distinct non-regular commerce and organized traficking
|
Luxembourg
|
(RU)
|
- No distinction
between soft and hard drugs, but courts distinguish between:
a) users who can receive a single warning (in case of very first
time) or treatment (consumption not usually prosecuted); b)
dealers who are pursued with repressive measures.
|
Nederlands
|
DU
- DP
SD
LC
- L?
|
- Possession
and sale of up to 5 g is generally not investigated.
- Possession
up to 30 g is a minor offence, with a maximum sentence of one
month's imprisonment and/or fine.
- Some guidelines
specify terms and conditions for sale, possession and use.
- Special
licences to public places (coffe-shops) that can sell up to
5 g per time per user.
|
Portugal
|
(RU)
|
- Each drug
has an official daily dose limit.
- Possession
is criminal offence since a 1993 law (before it was tolerated).
- If proven
it is for personal use and the person is an occasional user
small quantities may be punished less severely, even if it is
registered in the criminal record.
- If quantity
above three times the average daily permitted : punished more
severely
|
Spain
|
DU
- DP
SD
P?
|
- Possession
and use in public places is sanctioned by administrative measures.
- Distinction
is made between drugs which cause serious health problems and
those that do not, for cultivation and dealing.
|
Sweden
|
(DU)
|
- Possession
and use of cannabis are prohibited.
- Penalties
are defined according to the quantities involved.
- Use of
cannabis is sentenced with a fine. On a voluntany basis the
fine could be exchanged for counselling.
|
Switzerland
|
(DU
- DP)
|
- Federal
Law (LStup, revised in 1995) makes little distinctions between
drugs in function of their health risks.
- LStup states
that detention is like consumption -- except for "small
amounts". Punished from a 3-days to a 3-years jail sentences
or fines.
- Law enforcement
and prosecutions depend on local powers (Cantons). German-speaking
cantons are less strict, Frenc-speaking one more restrictive.
|
UK
|
DU
(DP)
SD
|
- Distinction
made between drugs (cannabis is a class B drug, heroin and MDMA
a class A one).
- Possession
of carries a maximum prison sentence of 5 years and/on an unlimited
fine.
- Supply
of cannabis carries a maximum sentence of 14 years and/or an
unlimited fine.
- Courts
may also apply caution, probation or community service.
- A January
2000 report by a conservative think-tank proposed to depenalize
cannabis and MDMA. Possession of cannabis
should never attract a prison sentence, but should instead be
subject to fines or other penalties.
|
Authors: Jerome
Thorel / Joel T. Auster
Sources :
1. European Monitoring Center for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA).
Compilation of 1997, 98 and 99 reports.
2. "Tableau résumé des législations européennes en matière de toxicomanie",
Observatoire français des drogues et de la toxicomanie (OFDT), internal
survey, November 1998 (unnamed author).
3. "Drug Use : Scientific and technological conntributions to the
assessment of policy options on drug use and related problems".
Workshop of 23-24 April, 1998, organized by the Scientific and Technological
Options Assessment (STOA) of the European Parliament.
4. Drugtext database on cannabis legislations, edited by the Foundation
on Drug Policy and Human Rights (FDPHR), Amsterdam.
5. Personal thanks to Maitre Francis CABALLERO, lawyer in Paris, France,
legal expert on drug policy; Doctor Lorentz BÖLLINGER, Dean, Legal Department,
University of Bremen, Board Member of the FDPHR and of the Association
for Cannabis in Medecine (ACM), Köln, Germany.
Personal collection
of figures and facts, January 2000.
|