Regulatory focus, ripeness and optimality dynamics
Overview: This research investigates the dynamic relationship between different modes of regulatory focus and social conflict across time. It builds on prior research in the area, but extends it by examining the combined effects of prevention and promotion orientations on experiences of conflict, and then employs a method for studying how the ratios of promotion-to-prevention orientation shift across time to influence these experiences.Publications from this project
Tuesday, January 18, 2000
Coleman, P. T., Kugler, K. G., and Vallacher, R. Regulatory focus dynamics and conflict: Investigating the relationship and ratios of prevention and promotion orientations to social conflict. Under review with Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
Tuesday, January 18, 2000
Coleman, P. T. (1997). Redefining ripeness: A social-psychological perspective. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 3(1). Abstract Ripeness is a construct of tremendous importance to both conflict resolution theory and practice. The conceptualizations of this construct in the literature, … Continue reading →
Tuesday, January 18, 2000
Coleman, P. T. (2000). Fostering ripeness in seemingly intractable conflict: An experimental study. International Journal of Conflict Management, 11(4), 300-317. Abstract: Disputant 'ripeness' is a state and a process of critical importance to the resolution of seemingly intractable conflict. Fostering … Continue reading →
Tuesday, January 18, 2000
Coleman, P. T., Fisher-Yoshida, B., Stover, M., Hacking, A., and Bartoli, A. (2008). Reconstructing ripeness II: Models and methods for fostering constructive stakeholder engagement across protracted divides. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 26(1), 43-69. Abstract A priority objective for diplomats, mediators, negotiators, … Continue reading →