Blackman Responds to Supreme Court on Executions | Teachers College Columbia University

Skip to content Skip to main navigation
Teachers College Newsroom

Teachers College Newsroom

Skip to content Skip to content

Blackman Responds to Supreme Court on Executions

Leonard Blackman, professor emeritus of education and psychology, was recently quoted regarding his stance on the execution of the retarded.

Leonard Blackman, professor emeritus of education and psychology, was recently quoted regarding his stance on the execution of the retarded. In response to the Supreme Court's June 2002 ruling that such punishment is unconstitutional for this group, Blackman argues that it is not the global definition of retardation that should set the standard for determining culpability, but rather, the extent to which an individual suffers deficiencies such as understanding cause and effect. Such variations exist in differing degrees among persons, ''So it is not enough to argue that a person with mental retardation automatically lacks the skills and abilities required for culpability for a capital offense without first knowing what skills and abilities the crime summons.''


The article, entitled "The Executioner's I.Q. Test" appeared in the June 29 edition of the The New York Times.

Published Wednesday, Jul. 2, 2003

Blackman Responds to Supreme Court on Executions

Leonard Blackman, professor emeritus of education and psychology, was recently quoted regarding his stance on the execution of the retarded. In response to the Supreme Court's June 2002 ruling that such punishment is unconstitutional for this group, Blackman argues that it is not the global definition of retardation that should set the standard for determining culpability, but rather, the extent to which an individual suffers deficiencies such as understanding cause and effect. Such variations exist in differing degrees among persons, ''So it is not enough to argue that a person with mental retardation automatically lacks the skills and abilities required for culpability for a capital offense without first knowing what skills and abilities the crime summons.''


The article, entitled "The Executioner's I.Q. Test" appeared in the June 29 edition of the The New York Times.

How This Gift Connects The Dots
 
Scholarships & Fellowships
 
Faculty & Programs
 
Campus & Technology
 
Financial Flexibility
 
Engage TC Alumni & Friends